LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑
I suggested the Dems threw the election deliberately by nominating a weak candidate (about 1 mo before the election) so Trump gets in, and you said that was very plausible
The Democrats foresee terrible events down the line, within the next 4 yrs (likely 2), and they would rather not take the blame
Here’s another subtle detail:
Kamala doesn’t seem fazed by her loss either, unlike Hillary who threw a tantrum. The Democratic leadership (not the rank and file sheeple or media personalities) are so far eerily “accommodating”
If something looks too good to be true…
(The script is already written, it just needs time to play out sort of thing)
We shall revisit this in due time…and I’ll be waiting for some greenies from you
It's an interesting theory, but I have my reservations about it. For one, Harris spent over 1 billion dollars on her campaign. That is a lot of money to spend if they just wanted to lose. Second, if they wanted to choose a weak candidate, then why not just leave Biden in? His approval ratings were so bad, that he wouldn't stand a chance.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=90783&p=2628993#p2628993