Liberal Forum

LowIQTrash » 07 Dec 2024, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 8:36 pm

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/next- ... pply-chain

Sentiment check please…

Uh…

1) It’s not the GUBMINT, it’s WALL STREET doing all 3 of those (although there isn’t much distinction these days)

How about:

———————————————

1. WALL STREET poisons you via “food” (or what passes as food in America) - Monsanto, McDonald’s + more

2. WALL STREET diagnoses, and then prescribes you pharmas to hide symptoms instead of resolving root causes (Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Pfizer, and more)

3. WALL STREET denies you coverage (Cigna, United, Humana)

———————————————

2) A decade ago, if “BAMMY” appointed the likes of RFK JR to oversee HHS / FDA, wouldn’t you decry that as SOSHALIZM? 

Isn’t that “GUBMINT OVERREACH?” 

We should let the free market solve the problem…by consumers boycotting products containing Red Dye #40!!   

(You guys are **** morons)

I just watched a 2015 documentary The Chocolate Diet I discovered while sifting through on-line local library offerings.
The hoax was revealed long ago but I never really knew how they set it up.
Basically they needed "peer review" for their study results. The results, not the actual study. That's key.
They had a statistician massage data sets until their needed conclusions could be reached.
Basically they didn't lie, they did do the study, control groups and double-blind protocols, they did weigh people, etc.

They determined the "formula" in getting a study to the public via some people knowledgable in that arena.
Massage data, find some peer to review, get it published, make sure media sees that publication, public embraces it.

9-10 years later people still believe dark chocolate is good for you.

-----
If 4 average people can produce this viral result,
Big Pharma and giant corporations can get away with whatever they want.