Vegas » 08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑
I guess the guy was also involved in insider trading. That is speculation, but it seems new info is coming to light about that. Either way, at what point, if there is one at all, is it ok to celebrate the murder of a person based on their deeds? We may justify it by saying that things will now change for the better. However, it's highly unlikely anything will change. There will be no policy changes and private insurances will still deny claims that should be accepted. They will replace the CEO ASAP and things will go back to how they always were.
My take on this is that I am unsure. I never encourage death upon someone else. However, I am not going to weep either. Therefore, I don't support the act, but I don't exactly feel bad about it either.
You used the word "celebrate".
I do not celebrate the murder of another.
So my vote reflects that. I also do not give a **** that he's dead.
Some people die dragging unconscious children from a burning orphanage.
Some people die because their goal is to climb the ladder of an insurance company.
One is selfless courage.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.