Skans » 22 Jan 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑
In the 1833 case of
United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case,
Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In
Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt.
https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/
Any fool would not accept it unless they were covering for someone or something else as I believe I read that once pardoned, you can't plead the 5th as it doesn't apply anymore if brought back into court for questioning...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."