User avatar
Deezer Shoove
22 Jan 2025 3:39 pm
User avatar
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
11,372 posts
Skans » 22 Jan 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ In the 1833 case of United States v. Wilson, the Supreme Court ruled that a pardon could be rejected by the convict. Due to the findings in the 1925 case, Burdick v. United States, it seems as though accepting a pardon is, in fact, admitting guilt. In Burdick the appellant was offered a pardon but declined it, also refusing to testify in criminal court. The opinion of the case given by the justices seemed to uncover that 1) a pardon can be given before a conviction and sentence; 2) a pardon can be refused, and 3) acceptance of a pardon implies acceptance of guilt.  https://courtmartiallaw.com/military-la ... mit-guilt/

Implies... Makes a difference from the word "is".
Please seat yourself.

Image

I like the very things you hate.
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search