Liberal Forum

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:07 pm

So I’ve been contemplating the answer to this question:

”Why are conservatives, who normally elect fiscal profligates into office, suddenly concerned about budget restraints? And why is the Orange Dotard on board, given the establishment of DOGE?”

The Orange Dotard wasn’t concerned about “budget deficits” in his first term, so there must be another reason.

———————————

My understanding is that the <[( Tiny Hat Foreskin Chompers)]> are in agreement that they do not want the US Dollar to possibly fail as the primary currency for international trade.

This is why the Fed has kept rates relatively high (by post 2009 standards) and, I believe, it will continue to remain hawkish - although Trump intends to challenge that soon.

When the US economy undergoes a long period of prosperity (such as the 90s), the THFCs like to cook up plans to siphon off the wealth, whether it’s creating a bunch of fraudulent IPOs in a stock market bubble and subsequently pulling the rug, 0% FFR to enable more asset speculation / flipping, or multiple rounds of QE (where all the “newly printed money” goes to the THFCs) or sending more aid to Israel. 

However, the THFC are also keenly aware that the golden goose will at some point stop laying eggs, so a little “reset” needs to happen.

Continued fiscal profligacy will force rates to return to 0% and possibly unleash a currency crisis. 

The barren fields need to be tilled for the next harvest…that’s what “austerity” is for. 

————————

This is the same suspicion I had with DEI programs. It was designed to siphon off wealth from / within corporate boardrooms (among other agenda).

Now that DEI is no longer useful to “them,” probably because that cow is milked to death, “they” can get rid of it - at least for now. 

And the retarded conjobs will think “their” efforts comprising of angry social media posts / voting for the Orange Dotard are what changed the course of this country, when that is all an illusion.