Zeets2 » 30 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑
Is that how you go through life? Just reading headlines and ignoring the body of the story to learn the entire scope of the topic?
Is it any wonder why you're such a pauper and a loser?
Pauper?
Something tells me you don't have two coins to rub together, Clete.
Zeets2 » 30 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑
As far as your own deductive reasoning goes, reading just a headline DOES NOT qualify you to comment on the facts in the remainder of the article.
It worked fine for me.
When the headline of your source refutes you, you're pretty stupid to use that source.
It becomes obvious that you just grab **** and slam it without even looking at it - a Gish Galloper who posts **** unworthy of attention.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?