Yesterday 6:15 pm
Wait.Vegas » Today, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, there are a lot of problems, not just one. However, one in particular is that the dims would benefit from that immensely. It would be a second California. We may as well call it California II. I don't know how many electoral votes they would be assigned, but it would be enough to tilt the election toward the dimocrats consistently. Of course, that makes all the libs horny. However, that doesn't do the country any good.
There are still going to be elections?
Are you saying the democ rats lied to us???
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?