7 Jun 2014 1:48 pm
No offense, but I found that reportage a tad dishonest. The claim that witnesses reported more than fifty shots were fired, tied to NRA lobbying to protect against magazine restrictions, is a deliberate implication that the "domestic terrorist" (or too-far-pushed citizen - you decide) fired those fifty shots. From his car. Before reaching the court house. While deploying stop sticks, And maintaining his vehicle's course (presumably with hands at ten and two - but with this type, don't count on it).Misty » 06 Jun 2014 5:17 pm » wrote: Amen.
So, CLEARLY, the real story is closer to something like: This poor loser never got off a shot before he was caught in a crossfire and mowed down in a fusillade of approximately 50 or more shots.
Someone in the cop shop probably owed him money, and the rest is fabrication. I have no evidence, but at least my reportage isn't pretending factuariality.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?