Yesterday 7:54 pm
I read his arguments, fruitcake. And they were backed by hot air.*Beekeeper » Today, 4:38 am » wrote: ↑ A "rambler"?? And you took 3 paragraphs to try to make that point??
Fact is, with the COSTS of maintaining an AGING and decrepit pipeline, a LEAKING ONE that loses product, and the costs to BUILD A NEW ONE makes LNG more attractive PRICE WISE no matter what it takes to get it to the point of origin. NO ONE said it was cheaper, but well within the margin to be cost effective. But had you actually READ the article, you might have known that.
There simply does not exist a more expensive transit for petrochem than sea traffic. And there is no CHEAPER method than pipe.
Consider considering that you might be quite stupid and easily gulled by word salad and brickface.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?