RichClem » 18 Jul 2014 8:07 am » wrote:
Ignoring the actual definition of Socialism; which is either government ownership or effective control by government of the private sector.
Like in Singapore? Roger.
I posted their ranking, stupid. The number two country has a government that owns 30% of the means of production. Before Heritage told you to think otherwise, that was known as "socialism."
RichClem » 18 Jul 2014 8:07 am » wrote:The psycho also ignores the significant if not massive changes in these countries.
Canada, for example, slashed government spending by half relative to GDP and has stated its intent to reform their health care system by Free Market Principles.[.quote]
Wow. Canada did that? Link? Lol - crazy old clem and his made up stats. And "has announced its intention?" LMFAO. Link, dummy?
But here's the hilarity:
"roughly" 20 years ago - moved STRONGLY

"toward: free market reform ever since. How much longer before they get all the way over to it, Art LinkLater?
And now, the piece de resistance:
To cite just two examples.
This pathetic hack believes a rhetorical question and a statement of fiath "Freedumb equals NOT soshulizm" = "examples!"
Since when is "proper regulation" thousands of pages if not tens of thousands of pages that micro manage a corporation's behavior, as Obamacare and Dodd-Frank do?
Since retard ronnie and his successors gutting regulations led to a predictable melt down, you **** idiot.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?