Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 18 Jul 2014 9:51 am » wrote: I posted their ranking, stupid. The number two country has a government that owns 30% of the means of production. Before Heritage told you to think otherwise, that was known as "socialism."

What do the following words mean, moonbat?

The ranking is relative.

Do you have the slightest comprehension of what that means? Obviously not.

Wow. Canada did that? Link? Lol - crazy old clem and his made up stats. And "has announced its intention?" LMFAO. Link, dummy?

I have cited many sources showing that Canada did just that. Typical of a moonbat to be totally ignorant of key historical facts, then bleat in ignorance and demand a source. I had a thread filled with sources showing this.

Go do your own homework, psycho. If I cite a source, you'll just lie and rant anyway.

But here's the hilarity:

"roughly" 20 years ago - moved STRONGLY "toward: free market reform ever since. How much longer before they get all the way over to it, Art LinkLater?

WTF does that mean, moonbat?

That you're again ignorant of important historical facts?

Since retard ronnie and his successors gutting regulations led to a predictable melt down, you **** idiot.

The necessary deregulation passed under Carter by Dems in the dead of night, moonbat, made necessary by Carter's high inflation. And it doubled the amount insured by the federal government for multiple accounts.

So once again you're stupidly blame Reagan for liberal incompetence.

"Retard Ronnie?" Yes, you truly are psychotic.