Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 21 Mar 2025, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Mar 2025, 6:41 pm

You're not gonna make a point, then. Telling me that DOGE hurt farmers without any explanation for the claim doesn't answer the challenge. Nor do the naked words, "cancer research."

Is this^ an implied challenge for me to name a few cuts that inarguably make sense? Is that how I should take it? Say it. No, no - SAY it. I dare ya to say it.

How quickly? What harm was done? Anything irreversible? Anything I should actually care about, out of decency? Say more about those.

If we wanted delicacy, we already had it. Obama promised to cut waste - and he did it so delicately, it was as if he didn't do it at all. To QUOTE that worthy, "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good." You say you're cool with someone doing something about waste and fraud - you're just not cool with how THESE guys are doing it.

Okay.

Who did it right, then - in your mind? Whose method SHOULD we be using? SHOW us the perfect, before you ask us to practice enmity against the good.

Unless you can tell us at least a WEE more specifically how it OUGHT to be done, we will continue to celebrate that it IS being done, and let the devil take the hindmost.