Liberal Forum

Str8tEdge » 19 Jul 2014 2:53 am » wrote:
It's a GREAT definition. Basically, any country with private property rights is not socialist, *******.

So you are standing AGAINST your own recent definitions - AGAIN.

Man, this gay **** never ends. Every **** post, these clowns are making up a whole new definition.

Here was Glory Hole's recent suggestion for a proper definition of socialism (emphasis his own, not mine),:

socialism
Syllabification: so·cial·ism
Pronunciation: /ˈsōSHəˌlizəm

noun
1A political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/de ... /socialism

By that standard, there are very, very few nations - if any - which are not socialist.

The entire conjob community is forced to CONSTANTLY change it's tune - thread to thread, and post to post - on the definition of socialism, for this simple reason: THEIR MIND-CONTROL SITES ARE CHANGING THE DEFINITION EVERY TIME A SOCIALIST COUNTRY KICKS A CAPITALIST COUNTRY'S ***.

.

**** morons - they couldn't tell the truth to Jesus' face.