Cannonpointer » 19 Jul 2014 5:32 am » wrote:Here was Glory Hole's recent suggestion for a proper definition of socialism (emphasis his own, not mine),:
By that standard, there are very, very few nations - if any - which are not socialist.
The entire conjob community is forced to CONSTANTLY change it's tune - thread to thread, and post to post - on the definition of socialism, for this simple reason: THEIR MIND-CONTROL SITES ARE CHANGING THE DEFINITION EVERY TIME A SOCIALIST COUNTRY KICKS A CAPITALIST COUNTRY'S ***.

.
**** morons - they couldn't tell the truth to Jesus' face.
.
Gosh, I want to address Socialism as 1) secondarily defined in one prestigious dictionary
and as actual Socialists themselves have applied it in the real world?
Outrageous!
To a psychotic.