User avatar
RichClem
19 Jul 2014 7:47 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Cannonpointer » 19 Jul 2014 5:32 am » wrote:Here was Glory Hole's recent suggestion for a proper definition of socialism (emphasis his own, not mine),:
By that standard, there are very, very few nations - if any - which are not socialist.

The entire conjob community is forced to CONSTANTLY change it's tune - thread to thread, and post to post - on the definition of socialism, for this simple reason: THEIR MIND-CONTROL SITES ARE CHANGING THE DEFINITION EVERY TIME A SOCIALIST COUNTRY KICKS A CAPITALIST COUNTRY'S ***.

Oops.

**** morons - they couldn't tell the truth to Jesus' face.
.

Gosh, I want to address Socialism as 1) secondarily defined in one prestigious dictionary and as actual Socialists themselves have applied it in the real world?

Outrageous!

To a psychotic. :clap:
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search