Liberal Forum

RichClem » 19 Jul 2014 8:02 am » wrote: Here's a hint, troll. Countries are ranked from freest to least free.

Ranked.

Yes, and you assume from facts not in evidence that socialism - which doesn't even have a definition anymore, according to you - is "less free." On what do you base that, the word having no precise meaning?

RichClem » 19 Jul 2014 8:02 am » wrote:Meaning in rough practical terms, it goes from relatively Communist to relatively Socialist to relatively Free Market.

According to you, and based on facts not in evidence. On which definition of socialism do you base that claim? Capitalism regulates market control to state sanctioned oligarchs with official imprimaturs and the various privileges attendant thereto. How is undefined socialism less free?

RichClem » 19 Jul 2014 7:52 am » wrote:Because there is no strict definition of any of those terms, the ranking cannot be exact.

Now they ALL lack definition - yet you insist on making definitive statements, and calling any who dare disagree moonbats?

RichClem » 19 Jul 2014 7:52 am » wrote: The two definitions I cited aren't conflicting. They are two means to the same goal; control of the private sector either through seizure, purchase or regulation.

TWO, you preposterous little man? LOFL. You have a different definition every time you run your mouth, spewie.

In another thread, you ran this tripe:

RichClem » 19 Jul 2014 7:52 am » wrote: This brainless troll can't deal with the fact that as Wikipedia and other sources clearly state, Socialism has no exact definition; it has many variants.

Perhaps my confusion is related to the fact that you use a different "variant" every time you tell another lie, hack - and so does every other retardo-con on the board.