Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 19 Jul 2014 8:12 am » wrote:

Yes, and you assume from facts not in evidence that socialism - which doesn't even have a definition anymore, according to you - is "less free." On what do you base that, the word having no precise meaning?

Little if anything in politics has a precise meaning, yet reasonable people manage to debate it.

We agree upon the primary definition. On the basis of nothing you reject the secondary definition I cited.

Then lie about my claims regarding regulation. No, moderate regulation doesn't make a country Socialist.

But when, for example, thousands of pages of law and 10's of thousands of pages of regulation micromanage a sector as Obamacare does, that law has obviously Socialized that sector.

TWO, you preposterous little man? LOFL. You have a different definition every time you run your mouth, spewie.

In another thread, you ran this tripe:
Perhaps my confusion is related to the fact that you use a different "variant" every time you tell another lie, hack - and so does every other retardo-con on the board.

The fact that there are variants, that no system is pure doesn't refute my obvious point that government controlling a sector via ownership or government micromanaging a sector via regulation achieve essentially the same goal.

Government control.

Duuuh.