2 Apr 2025 8:23 am
You get a B for setting up the problem correctly. You show surprising comprehension, given your posting history -bolstering my theory that you're more dishonest than stupid.Blackvegetable » Today, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑
That's the way both surveys work. And have for decades. A change in administrations doesn't change the methodologies.
Both ask respondents for status at a point in time...it is binary - you are either employed (under the definitions of each of the two surveys), or you are not.
The number is then compared with that from the previous period.
There's little statistical value in a gross number of jobs "created"...the value is in the number of people employed.
It's not "theirs"....it's BLS's.
Of course it does, you dumb ****...it is why it is "NET".
Cretin.
@Cannonpointer
Trusting your inputs is a separate question, distinct from the issue that Vegas raised.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?