Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
so your example is NOT one of Sampling error..
therefore it cannot be an example of Survivorship bias.
QED.
No, Veghead, that’s not how logic—or survivorship bias—works. Sampling error is
one way survivorship bias can occur, not the only way. Survivorship bias is about
drawing conclusions based only on those who made it through a process, while ignoring those who didn’t. That can happen in analysis, reporting, or interpretation—not just sampling.
So yes, my example
is survivorship bias because it critiques how focusing only on net job gains ignores losses, labor force exits, and job quality. That’s not a data collection flaw—it’s a
cognitive blind spot in how the results are interpreted and presented. But sure, slap “QED” on it and pretend you just won a debate you never actually participated in.
QED
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=90783&p=2628993#p2628993