Liberal Forum

jerrab » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

• harris is not even menioned.
•  
• ------------------------------------------

https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-t ... to-deliver

•  
• Was skewed to the rich. Households with incomes in the top 1 percent will receive an average tax cut of more than $60,000 in 2025, compared to an average tax cut of less than $500 for households in the bottom 60 percent, according to the Tax Policy Center (TPC).[1] As a share of after-tax income, tax cuts at the top — for both households in the top 1 percent and the top 5 percent — are more than triple the total value of the tax cuts received for people with incomes in the bottom 60 percent.[2]
• Was expensive and eroded the U.S. revenue base. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated in 2018 that the 2017 law would cost $1.9 trillion over ten years,[3] and recent estimates show that making the law’s temporary individual income and estate tax cuts permanent would cost another roughly $400 billion a year beginning in 2027.[4] 

2017 trump tax law?    why didn't biden/harris stop it? they had 4 years. what do you mean "harris is not even menioned."