User avatar
jerra b
8 Apr 2025 2:15 pm
User avatar
      
9,319 posts
HarperLee » Today, 3:54 am » wrote: Understood.

However,  the facts of the case and the evidence do not support multiple shooters.
If so other people would be hurt, numerous other wounds in Kennedy and the limo would be filled with bullet holes.



He killed a police officer and 11 witnesses identified him.
However,  Mark Lane finds one witness that claimed the shooter was short and heavy.  Oswald was not heavy.
And that's enough to ignore the 11 other witnesses?

 
------------Another witness, Helen Markham, also saw the killing. However, she described the killer as being short and somewhat on the heavy side, with slightly bushy hair." Later, Markham identified Oswald in a police lineup, but this was after she had seen his photograph on television.Warren Reynolds did not see the shooting but saw the gunman running from the scene of the crime. He claimed that the man was not Oswald. After he survived an attempt to kill him, he changed his mind and identified Oswald as the man he had seen.Four cartridge cases were found lying on the ground near the scene of the murder. It would seem that the killer had opened the chamber of his gun and manually ejected the cases. Instead of immediately fleeing the scene of the crime, he deliberately stopped and discarded four vital pieces of evidence that could have been used against him. The four cartridge cases were traced to Oswald's revolver, although they were never matched to the bullets.
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum