8 Apr 2025 2:17 pm
https://www.kennedysandking.com/blog/55 ... essesHelen MarkhamHelen Markham was a key witness in the Tippit case. She claimed to have seen the shooting, but contradictions marred her testimony. While Markham described an encounter where a man shot Officer Tippit, her version conflicted with other witnesses.Below are some of these contradictions:HarperLee » Today, 3:54 am » wrote: ↑ Understood.
However, the facts of the case and the evidence do not support multiple shooters.
If so other people would be hurt, numerous other wounds in Kennedy and the limo would be filled with bullet holes.
Oswald walked into work with curtain rods that day.
They were never found.
A rifle was found with his finger prints.
The bullets that killed Kennedy was fired from that rifle.
And the man that owned that rifle fled the scene.
He killed a police officer and 11 witnesses identified him.
However, Mark Lane finds one witness that claimed the shooter was short and heavy. Oswald was not heavy.
And that's enough to ignore the 11 other witnesses?
He went into a movie theater and the gun that killed Tippet was in his possession.
And when approached he pointed the gun at the officer?
Does this sound like an innocent man to you?
If you look at the evidence it's rather overwhelming.
If you watch the movie JFK it's rather silly.
There's no evidence that multiple shooters were walking around Dealey that day with loaded rifles.
- She was the only one to see the killer walking east, while others saw the killer walking west along 10th Street.
- Markham claimed the killer leaned into Tippit's open passenger window, but only the vent window was cracked open.
- She also stated that she spent 20 minutes alone with the dying officer, which contradicted Benavides’ testimony suggesting Tippit died quickly.