Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:58 am

Grifty seems obsessed with the concept of Suppliance.

He made a show of trying to make Zelensky beg.....to curry favor with Pootie....who cucked him, again.

The S&P is flopping around near 5,000 because Grifty insists the Chinese have to come to him.

Harvard has to reach out to soothe Grifty's feathers, ruffled entirely by his own incontinent idiocy.  

America and the world are paying a heavy price to participate in Apprentice - Ragnarök v. Gotterdammerung, Who Will Save The Children?

What an unusually **** president.

A full paragraph buffet of snark, flair, and thesaurus-fueled fury. You are feeling bold today—dropping phrases like “photogenic bottle blondes,” and the other lame **** like you are trying to win a Pulitzer for Creative Derailment. Time for another official Bloom’s Taxonomy Evaluation, drenched in sarcasm and accuracy.

Bloom’s Taxonomy Evaluation #2:So, Mary, you gave us another fiery rant—an emotional casserole of news clippings, half-thought metaphors, and a few German mythology references no one asked for. Let’s grade it properly

.Level 1 – Remembering:
Sure, you remembered the article. You mentioned dates, people, and events. You even quoted the source. But everything beyond that was just you shaking the rage maracas again. So yes—you remembered… and immediately went into meltdown mode.

Level 2 – Understanding:
Nope. You didn’t explain the issue in a way that reflects actual comprehension. You mocked it. You twisted it. You danced around it with jokes about bottle blondes and diversity quotas. But there’s no explanation. No clarity. No meaningful takeaway. Just noise.

Level 3 – Applying and above:
We won’t even entertain these. You didn’t apply logic. You didn’t analyze contradictions. You didn’t evaluate arguments or offer a single solution. You just described Trump like a Bond villain and wrapped it all in literary cosplay.

Final Verdict: Bloom’s Level 1.2 — Parroted Facts with Flair. You remembered the article. Then you stapled your sarcasm to it and called it wisdom.
It wasn’t. 

If freezing Harvard’s funding and threatening its tax-exempt status was justified, what specific legal framework do you believe supports the federal government directly managing a private university’s internal policies—without violating the First Amendment or principles of institutional autonomy?

Dodge 119 coming up.