ConservativeWave » Today, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑
That's not correct... the TRUTH is there are VARIOUS ways to implement and count votes in a ranked voting process... Ref. below:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting
AND, in a WORLD where elections are ALREADY subverted, manipulated, and BASTARDIZED WAY too often... ALL WE NEED is MORE Variables, and MORE opportunity for CORRUPTION...
I say NOT ONLY NO... but HELL NO !!
The mumbo jumbo on the wiki page has nothing to do with what is being proposed and used in some states
HOW RANKED CHOICE VOTING WORKS
Ranked choice voting (RCV) — also known as instant runoff voting (IRV) — makes our elections better by allowing voters to rank candidates in order of preference.
RCV is straightforward: Voters have the option to rank candidates in order of preference: first, second, third and so forth. If your first choice doesn’t have a chance to win, your ballot counts for your next choice.
RCV works in all types of elections and supports more representative outcomes. RCV means better choices, better campaigns, and better representation.
https://fairvote.org/our-reforms/ranked-choice-voting/
its simple
the one party system just make **** up to maintain the status quo