Vegas » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Ah, another thrilling installment of Grifticles Presents: Screenshot Journalism—complete with a quote, a link, and a request for applause. No argument. No context. No original thought. Just another tossed headline with a wink, followed by the usual:
So here’s the pattern, yet again:
- Drop a quote from someone else
- Avoid taking a stance
- Demand everyone else “interpret” it for you
- Call them idiots when they do
If this thread were any more hollow, it’d echo. Still waiting for something past Level 1, Grifticles. But hey—Dodge #143 still count.Let’s help you out, Grifticles. Since you’ve already outsourced your thinking to the Washington Post (again), I’ll go ahead and toss you a question you can immediately sidestep:
Now, go ahead and pretend you don’t understand your own OP.
Or better yet—ask me to “demonstrate mine” again while you sprint toward Dodge #143. Clock’s ticking.
1. Easy one - He will now hide behind his favorite loop "demonstrate that you understand the OP."