Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

You better be dead when posting that.

So **** g'ddammned stupid....

Kill yourself now.

Your quote of mine does nothing to prove a contradiction. You do what you always do. Stalk. You found an old thread about it and then pretend it's a mic drop on your behalf. You literally proved nothing. 

 Let's get back to it. Give the full definition. NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

This is a partial definition — it's on the right track but lacks clarity about why this matters (i.e. the distortion it causes) and how it happens (i.e. filtering out failures or dropouts).

1. You will stalk again and post a quote/thread that does nothing to gain favor for your side...but you will pretend it does. **** moron.