Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Sweet Jeebus, I haven't argued this issue and I don't recall hearing the term before you guys raised it, but I knew iummediately which answer fit the definition.

All of those answers fit his definition, but there is only one correct answer. His definition is ambiguous and incomplete. Math is very precise with its definitions. It has to be. What he did was take an element of a definition (that he still doesn't know) and generalized it. It's like being asked to identify Trump and then saying if he has blue eyes, then it's Trump. Well ok. Yes, Trump has blue eyes, but so do millions of other people.