Vegas » Yesterday, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑
I wouldn’t call myself a Civil War buff, but it’s the era of U.S. history I enjoy reading about most. Right now, I’m working through a personal project: reading the biographies of the key generals on both sides. I started with Grant, moved on to Robert E. Lee, and plan to continue with Sherman, Stonewall Jackson, and others until I’ve covered them all.
The war is full of unusual moments — almost eerie — that make you wonder if there was something more at play. One that stands out is the death of Stonewall Jackson. He was Lee’s brilliant right hand, a relentless and creative tactician the Union could never quite counter. But one night, while scouting, he was mistaken for an enemy soldier and shot by his own men. He later died from his wounds.
What’s striking is that Jackson wasn’t stopped by Union strategy, but by a tragic accident. And here’s the kicker: many historians believe that if Jackson had lived, the South might have won at Gettysburg — one of the most decisive battles of the war. If that’s true, a single moment of misfire may have changed the entire course of American history.
The Civil War is a very interesting time in history. Worthy of a deep dive. I've done some deep dives into the American Revolution - I don't know why, but the pre-Revolutionary war era and Revolutionary war grab me more than the mid 1800's and the Civil War.
That doesn't mean the Civil War is any less complex or worthy of study. It definitely is, and I really should do some deeper dives into the Civil War. If I did, I would likely uncover some hidden gems like you did. Perhaps one day I'll focus more on it.