User avatar
Huey
3 Jun 2022 1:49 pm
User avatar
      
34,490 posts
Blackvegetable » 03 Jun 2022, 1:46 pm » wrote:
Huey » 03 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm » wrote: Your principle is, VERBATIM:

As a matter of Principle, the idea that The State can force women to bear children is fundamentally objectionable.

Once you accept that fact, you are left with leaving any decision relating to her pregnancy to the woman so afflicted.

So the direct answer to where you are going is "Yes, any time."

You can play semantics all you like if it makes you sleep better at night.  

PS.  What is vebatim?
This is the Principle at issue.

You can assume it is so because it is so labeled. 
As a matter of Principle, the idea that The State can force women to bear children is fundamentally objectionable.
This is the Consequence 
Once you accept that fact, you are left with leaving any decision relating to her pregnancy to the woman so afflicted.

So the direct answer to where you are going is "Yes, any time."
Do you understand the distinction?

 

I understand the distinction you are trying to create.  

I understand the direct answer to my question concerning you supporting abortion beyond 20 weeks is Yes, anytime.  

Your words.  Verbatim.  Or is it VEBATIM? 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search