12 Sep 2025 3:34 pm
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑No, you're not.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Still waiting on your definition and what specific assault weapons you are asking about.
You're running scairt...
Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑Since you refuse to specify what assault weapons you are discussing OR define what an assault weapon is I will go with this:Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/1. I have never said I was in FAVOR of machine gun regelations as they stand since 1986
- Military-style features:
Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines.
2. What you call an assault weapon, and all bans of such, are not based on function but on cosmetic features. Removal of some of those features in some juridictions make them legal BUT they still have the same operation. THey are still nothing more than a semi auto.Acknowledge you were answered.
Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑No, you're not.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Still waiting on your definition and what specific assault weapons you are asking about.
You're running scairt...
Although I answered based on the best available info I should went with the NH definition.
What is odd is the comment you are not man enough to link too is dated 15 Aug. You debated me alll day on the 16th UNTIL I curbstombed you on the above conversation.Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑
267 notifications since Aug 17th.
Not including secondary notifications because he tagged me, repeatedly, in threads and exchanges in which I played no part.
Even took off his @* tunic so he could violate his own rule, again.
You did not start "ignoring"me until the 17th. No sir, You got your *** kicked and you ran. Stop lying. Do you have that definition yet? LMAO!
@Vegas
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152