Trump promises Back Off Sanctions and NATO Post #691309 • Liberal Forum

Re: Trump promises Back Off Sanctions and NATO

MR-7 · 2025-09-14T18:04:11+00:00

CoPilot says this.... Financial Burden The U.S. contributes the lion’s share of NATO’s defense spending—more than all other members combined. Critics argue that wealthy European nations should shoulder more of their own defense costs. Sovereignty and Strategic Flexibility Leaving NATO could allow the U.S. to pursue its own foreign policy without being bound by alliance obligations. Some believe NATO commitments entangle the U.S. in conflicts that don’t serve its direct interests. Outdated Mission Originally formed to counter the Soviet Union, NATO’s purpose is seen by some as obsolete in a post-Cold War world. Critics claim the alliance has expanded too broadly, diluting its strategic focus. Uneven Burden-Sharing Many NATO members fail to meet the 2% GDP defense spending target, frustrating U.S. policymakers. This imbalance fuels the perception that the U.S. is subsidizing European security.

CoPilot says this....

Financial Burden

The U.S. contributes the lion’s share of NATO’s defense spending—more than all other members combined.
Critics argue that wealthy European nations should shoulder more of their own defense costs.

Sovereignty and Strategic Flexibility

Leaving NATO could allow the U.S. to pursue its own foreign policy without being bound by alliance obligations.
Some believe NATO commitments entangle the U.S. in conflicts that don’t serve its direct interests.
Outdated Mission
Originally formed to counter the Soviet Union, NATO’s purpose is seen by some as obsolete in a post-Cold War world.
Critics claim the alliance has expanded too broadly, diluting its strategic focus.

Uneven Burden-Sharing

Many NATO members fail to meet the 2% GDP defense spending target, frustrating U.S. policymakers.
This imbalance fuels the perception that the U.S. is subsidizing European security.

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.