Cannonpointer » 04 Dec 2014 6:40 pm » wrote:
Attempting to limited WHOSE free speech, nanny state? The court said it was the CORPORATION which had the rights- INDEPENDENT FROM those actual, real-life people WHO WERE NOT PARTIES TO THE CASE, whom you lied were being denied their rights. The court did not find ONE HUMAN BEING whose rights were violated, you lying little huey coward.
As a general rule, committed liar, court verdicts are awarded in favor of either PLAINTIFFS, or DEFENDANTS - not in favor of fucking bystanders, you lying little rat-mouth.
The First Amendment prohibits Congress from restricting speech,
and Obama's lawyers argued that they could do just that, censoring political books and movies.
Maybe that will fit into your pea brain someday.