Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 04 Dec 2014 11:39 pm » wrote: Gosh, Clemmie - that was quick

A LOT quicker than your not-yet-delivered response to the fact that unemployment goes DOWN on the heels of raising Minimum Wage - which pretty much refutes your entire sycophantic existence. More important;y, slave, it flies in the face of Heritage Christ, It throws PIES at Heritage Christ. It makes then look like clowns,, clown.

Oh, by the way: Thanks for sharing YOUR view of CU for the 100rth time. You DO understand that the SCOTUS has THEIR view, too - right?

Now, what YOU said about CU is right above where I started typing. It's available , if you ever decide to compare it with what the SCOTUS said. You see, what the SCOTUS said is ALSO available - has been made available on this very board, in this very thread. And that's a good thing, because YOUR theory of CU and the SCOTUS' theory of CU are very different.

The SCOTUS didn't come at it - as you did - from the perspective of Congress' powers. They're educated. They know the Congress has greater or lesser powers based on showing a compelling governmental interest. That's why they don't just dogmatically quote the same few words. over and over and over, like a fifth grader looking for attention.

And what THEY - the SCOTUS - decided is that corporations have rights - their OWN rights, not the people's who work there, AS CORPORATIONS, not as people or a group of people.

That's what they said.

The SCOTUS, I mean. The SCOTUS said CORPORATIONS have rights - instead of, "Congress can never, ever, ever, ever, EVER restrict speech" - YOUR ruling in the case, Judge Cletis, made from your most hallowed Porcelain Chamber.