Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2022, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 7:34 am

Huey » 13 Jun 2022, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 7:27 am

If you say so.  It is obvious you have never heard of a SAW, never mind carried and shot one.  

ATF definition of a machine gun:

For the purposes of the National Firearms Act the term Machinegun means:

• Any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger
  ​
• The frame or receiver of any such weapon
  ​
• Any part designed and intended solely and exclusively or combination of parts designed and intended for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun, or
• Any combination of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person.

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firearms-g ... initions-0

Here is the ATF list of Class 3 weapons.  Go ahead and post where the DDM4, or any AR 15 is on the list.

was the AR 15 designed and developed and THEN classified by ATF, or was it classified by the ATF THEN  designed and developed?

**** nitwit.

Read the citation, "armorer"
 

 

Here is an interesting article you won't read:

Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/12/origin ... z7W604w2X0
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians.







So much for the argument that this rifle was never intended for the civilian market. Now a FOIA production of the original classification letter proves even ATF agreed at the time. (“A 1963 Colt AR-15 Advertisement”/Soldier Systems.)

That should clear up any confusion you have concerning the issue and your question.