Liberal Forum

Huey » 13 Jun 2022, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 8:01 am

Here is an interesting article you won't read:

Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/12/origin ... z7W604w2X0
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians.



So much for the argument that this rifle was never intended for the civilian market. Now a FOIA production of the original classification letter proves even ATF agreed at the time. (“A 1963 Colt AR-15 Advertisement”/Soldier Systems.)

That should clear up any confusion you have concerning the issue and your question.