Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The 7 Questions That Will Decide The MN Homicide
19 Jan 2026 11:14 am
The devil is in the details, fruitcake. The argument of those against the copper is that he did NOT reasonably believe any such thing. The argument is that if he was afraid of being runned over, he would have brought his CAR to block her in, instead of exiting it to put his body there as an excuse to murder an annoying citizen.Beekeeper » 19 Jan 2026, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ ALL 12:42 is ****.
- M.S. 609.066 (Deadly Force by Police): Justifies officers using deadly force if they reasonably believe it's necessary to protect themselves or others from death or great bodily harm, including when a vehicle is used aggressively against them.
Try to understand the argument from both sides, son.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?