Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2026, 10:27 am

Huey » 25 Jan 2026, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2026, 10:15 am

Not an idiot.  I am quite familiar with your ability to slither away because you simply refuse to take a stand and are intentionally ambiguous.  It is very important for a snake like you too publicly post specifically post what you are talking about.

Thank you for finally doing so.  Her statement was hearsay.  That's all we need to know.  As what I posted said.  And Smith testified that although it was hearsay he still did not decide to to remove her form the witness list.

Not an idiot.  I am quite familiar with your ability to slither away because you simply refuse to take a stand and are intentionally ambiguous.  It is very important for a snake like you too publicly post specifically post what you are talking about. Thank you for finally doing so.

You never provide an example.
Post the date of my 7th post of this thread.

Thank you for finally doing so.  Her statement was hearsay.  That's all we need to know.  As what I posted said.

she was party to the conversation. 

What she describes is not testimony of illegal acts. It wouldn't be disallowed as "hearsay".

Smith's decision has nothing to do with her credibility, it is about relevance.

She has not been contradicted by either of the others.


You don't know any of the detail, only the slogan.