30 Mar 2013 11:05 am
Nice try at dodging your actual words. If you'd claimed he first had an affair with a woman, then many years later was approached and seduced by her 30-something year old daughter, that would be a fair, honest criticism of him.Fund was approached and seduced by her?Were you there Puss? ROFLInstead you smeared him as a "molester" of her daughter, accusing him of being a child molester.That's a lie. I had remembered hearing something about a scandal involving John Fund and the daughter of his ex-girlfriend, but I didn't know what it was all about, which is why I asked the question.MistyBlue, on 18 Sept 2008 - 18:07, said:Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?Since when is asking a question a smear?Having an affair with a 30-something year old woman is not "molestation," liar.Right and I had no idea how old she was when I asked the question.The fact remains that you consider a man who slept with both a mother and her daughter a man of high integrity.Most people think that kind of behavior is immoral and disgusting.But then you also think that e-mailing people bestiality videos does not disqualify one from running for governor of New York, so I'm not surprised.Misty, on 29 Mar 2013 - 11:52, said:A couple of bestiality videos Puss.So exactly how many woman on horse videos does it take for you to think that someone is not qualified to run for elective office?Hey moonbat, he sent a couple short clips as a joke. Given that your serious claims are sicker than that joke, you shouldn't throw stones.If he had a collection somewhere, that would entirely different.Once again, you just pull facts out of your ***. Carl Paladino sent out a whole series of racist and pornographic e-mails to his friends.And even if it was just 'a couple of short clips' containing bestiality, WTF?Most normal people think that's sick and perverted.You obviously have the morals of an alley cat.I hope for their sake, you don't own any pets.