Liberal Forum

*Roshambo » 10 Feb 2026, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 9:45 pm

I hope they find the proof and prosecute those that did it. Until then, I am not convinced the election was stolen.
Once again, it the system is "rigged" as Trump has claimed, no stopping it, voter ID or not.

No, I GET it. You believe that a sick old man hiding from cameras out-polled a vibrant, youthful Barrack Obama. It's gay, obviously. But you be you.

*Roshambo » 10 Feb 2026, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 9:45 pm

And this brings me back to my original statements.

The BIGGEST hole needs to be plugged, first.
What you have to ask yourself is do you believe the **** coming out of Trump's mouth. That **** got Ashli Babbitt killed.

As I told you, I was there, on the mall, casting a shadow for the drones to count.

So, yeah: I believe Joey's handlers stole the election. And you believe the gay fantasy that Biden kicked Obama's *** at the polls with the largest number of votes in history.

How ANYONE can doubt your gay homosexuality and probable queerity is beyond me, but I do understand you believe that sodomitious nonsense.

*Roshambo » 10 Feb 2026, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 9:45 pm

What I agree is as follows: 

The issue with this argument is that time and time again, voter photo ID laws are proven to be ineffective tools to fight voter fraud — in the rare instances it does take place. While voter photo ID laws aim to prevent in-person voter impersonation, an almost non-existent form of voter fraud, other types of voter impersonation are similarly rare and not cause for significant concern. According to the Brennan Center, the rate of in-person voter impersonation is extremely low: only 0.00004% of all ballots cast. It’s worth noting that this rate is even significantly lower than other rare forms of voter fraud, such as absentee ballot fraud, which voter photo ID laws do not address.

Don't care. If you cannot maintain ID, you are too stupid to vote in MAH Murka.

*Roshambo » 10 Feb 2026, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 9:45 pm

Before you start in on Mail In Voting...

Out of 250,000,000 votes cast by mail between 2000 and 2020, there were 193 criminal convictions. By those numbers, a person is more likely to be struck by lightning than they are to commit voter fraud.

That is the dumbest argument you've ever made, betraying FUNDAMENTAL ignorance of how math works.

Those numbers do not comment on the likelihood of in-mail voter fraud. They comment EXCLUSIVELY on the likelihood of conviction.

And that thing you just did? That thing where you immediately thought I was nit-picking? That is what makes you an ignoranimous. I am not nit-picking. I am teaching you how math works. Specifically, the proper use of statistics.

You cannot take one category - in this case, criminal convictions, - and use it as a proxy for an entirely different category - votor fraud. The unsupported assumption that apprehension naturally follows commission, and conviction naturally follows apprehension, displays what one would HOPE is willful ignorance - but what one strongly suspects is utter ignorance.

If votor fraud is successful, the side that won is in charge of prosecutions. 

Sit with it.

Just **** sit with it. Just TRY, ffs.   

*Roshambo » 10 Feb 2026, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 9:45 pm

Further, there are already measures in place to detect irregularities and investigate potential cases of voter fraud, making the need for further legislation even smaller.

At the end of the day, everyone you elect answers to the same cabal. Nothing they promised you will be delivered. So this argument is entirely academic.

But it DID give us a look at your math chops, and I say your junior high school owes you an apology - or you, it. SOMEONE let their end down in a big way.