B.See » 16 Jun 2022, 11:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I've got several Ginni Thomas stories among today's headlines (that I'm still compiling and will post later). But I agree.
Fact is, even BEFORE the now obvious Ginni Thomas involvement in an attempted INSURRECTION, there were conflict of interest issues raised awhile back, when Thomas and Scalia were scampering off to right winged, Koch funded and Heritage Foundation think tanks. THAT should never have been.
Problem being there are no ethics guidelines for the one court where one would THINK ethics WOULD BE PARAMOUNT. That needs to CHANGE.
'Layers of a rotten onion': Experts say Ginni Thomas looks like 'a full-fledged potential co-conspirator' - Alternet.org