User avatar
Cannonpointer
Yesterday 3:32 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
44,218 posts
Zeets2 » Yesterday, 8:56 am » wrote: Oh, so now you've decided that NATO ONLY has to respond to an invasion?
An armed attack will do.

An armed resopnse will not, you wheedling, wheezing, cheese eating queer.
Zeets2 » Yesterday, 8:56 am » wrote: Not ballistic missiles fired at our embassies?
In response to our bombing them?[/quote]

No.
Zeets2 » Yesterday, 8:56 am » wrote: Not terrorist attacks?
No.
Zeets2 » Yesterday, 8:56 am » wrote: Not bombing our military bases?
No.
Zeets2 » Yesterday, 8:56 am » wrote: How about a nuclear bomb hitting us, you ignorant buffoon?  Is THAT an invasion?
If we got nuked, NATO would be entirely irrelvant. We would turn the offending party to glass, you hysterical ***.
 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search