Liberal Forum

He's a "child molester," she lied. Can't get much uglier than that. Of course you can't produce the quote where I said, 'he's a child molester' because I never said it.I had heard something about a scandal involving John Fund and the daughter of his ex girlfriend, so I asked a question.Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?Of course you keep posting my question and ignore the fact that later in that thread, after I had familiarized myself with the facts of the story, I said:Is that the same John Fund who **** the daughter of his ex-girlfriend?Nothing there about her being a child or being molested, is there Puss?Fund may not be a 'child molester' but the fact remains that he had a sexual relationship with both a mother and daughter. Most decent people find that disgusting.And as for the assertion that you pulled out of your *** that the daughter 'seduced' John Fund, it doesn't matter if she threw herself at him, she should have been off limits.The fact that you defend someone who could do something like that says a lot about you.