20 Jun 2022 2:52 pm
Well, that would be a different argument. On the core argument we support the 2nd Amendment. On carrying it the Constitution doesn’t specifically cover accept to say we can bear arms. In that case it is for the states to decide on how to handle it.Independent » 20 Jun 2022, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I thought the British attacked Concord because that is where the militia stored their weapons and gunpowder?
My point is that I don’t think the second amendment was about being able to walk about everyday with guns.
I think it is about the right to store arms should your tyrannical government need to be overthrown.
Just strict interpretation.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152