Well, there was always the off-chance that you were smart enough to understand that a European MIC would compete with out own - which is one of the two reasons why NATO really exists. The other is to provide cover for the crimes of empire.
You don't get it. They didn't WANT the divorce. They're the abandoned spouse. The US is leaving them holding the bag in the failed Coupkraine Project. Then it's cutting off their petrol from the middle east, making them vassal-clients of US oil interests. Then it's hitting htem with tariffs, and threatening them with more.
The love is gone, stooge.
Zeets2 » 14 Apr 2026, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑
Cut NATO funding to the bone, and Trump can then build a real coalition with countries that see the value of our alliance, and let Europe safeguard their own oil tankers through the Gulf.
NATO "funding" is a side show, tard. The total funding for NATO is 5 Billion. With a B.
The total spent on weapons and materiel - most of it with the US MIC - is 1.5 Trillion.
With a T, you ignorant ape.
The US' inordinate share of the NATO budget is a talking point - not a thing. We spent more studying the sex habits of the South American swamp rat.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?