Liberal Forum

MR-7 » Today, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:06 pm

The order wasn’t “landmark.” It wasn’t even binding. It was a voluntary testing framework and a cybersecurity memo. Not a ban. Not a licensing regime. Not a regulatory structure. Not enforcement. Not oversight. Saying this is “landmark regulation” is like saying BV is an Intermediate skier.

You are correct. But If this is only voluntary and modest, why was it too dangerous to keep? If it was only voluntary testing, cybersecurity coordination, and risk assessment, then it would not have crippled American innovation. it was a modest first step, not heavy-handed regulation. If even a voluntary framework is considered too much, then the real objection seems to be oversight itself. America keeps its edge by building AI that is powerful, trustworthy, secure, and resilient.

Now we don't even have a first step anymore.