Liberal Forum

MR-7 » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

39 minutes ago

Slack-Jaw, you keep screaming about a “1929 crash” like you’ve unlocked something, but every actual number says you’re just guessing... AAII bearish sentiment is still 30%+, retail inflows are down nearly half from 2021, margin debt is 20% below peak, unemployment is still under 5%, credit spreads aren’t widening, and your big Bitcoin “I warned them” story falls apart the second someone checks the chart and sees the move was a normal 38% BTC correction, not some you discovered...you’re not predicting anything ****, you’re just praying for a **** meltdown because the market keeps proving your *** wrong. 

 

Mr-7, you think you are intelligent because you plugged my half-serious comments (read: banter) into AI, but you are in reality a low IQ vermin with zero individual thinking abilities. Everyone (even the MAGATs) knows your comment is AI slop, so I am in theory not even obligated to respond to any of it.

But I will do so anyway to prove what a quarterwit you are.

1) When I say there are no bears left, that was a joke. At any given moment there are people who are shorting the market. Everyone with a pulse knows that (except you apparently, because you're married to AI slop replies - a common trait of a LOW IQ TRASH). I am referring to common sentiment that the "market will never crash again and that every dip will be bought up" you fckin maggot because that's what the average trader believes, not to mention bears have done very poorly since April 2025 so many of them have given up. Only the most stubborn bears are still shorting actively.

2) Nobody gives a **** about retail inflows in 2026 compared to 2021, when retail inflows was at an all time high due to M2 going vertical and thousand dollar checks going out to everyone. I'm referring to retail behavior since 2025. If you knew anything about investing you would compare appropriate time frames / macro conditions and not past cycles you retarded *** goon.

3) Yes, in fact, I did call the Bitcoin crash. You are too stupid to do something of that level so you assume I must be wrong. A 50% (not 38%) decline is a crash.

[Let me guess, you're going to say I'm wrong because Bitcoin in fact declined 52.3% from its peak to as of now as I am typing this non-AI response and not "50%?"

You are worthless ****. Also who bothers quoting AI when your AI uses sources like these:

SOURCES: Coin Gecko, Cornmarket]

     

**** idiot.

4) Oh no, I misremembered the $100M cumulative sell orders as an individual block. 

5) The current unemployment rate, earnings, credit spread, etc. has no bearing whatsoever because the market is forward looking / based on collective participants' expectations. There is also something called a "black swan" - maybe you should ask your favorite AI about that.

6) Commodities tend to top after stocks. This is apparent after my studying of several market cycles dating back to 1973. Unlike you I know how to look up charts and study prior cycle patterns. 

-----------------

Do not post something like SOURCE: FRED historical commodity data when it's apparent you would be incapable of reading any such charts. And even if you were capable it's obvious you did not do so (BTW, the proper way to refute the argument is to compare a chart of SPX and gold, oil, etc. on the same time frames. The FRED historical commodity data is not a valid comparison point because I am only interested in a small % of the whole basket).

You merely copy pasted my comment (half were made jokingly as I stated before) and told your pet AI "Please refute these arguments," and pretended you are some kind of intelligent person when you are subhuman vermin.