Why modern debate methods are useless. You end up like Charlie Kirk, K'fools, and BV. Hence, no truth. Post #793921 • Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
4 minutes ago
It is not the method but the men who make the difference. The men whose argumentation you rightly hold as the ideal were ubermenschen, likely with some mysterious access to stimulating their pineal gands. The men you rightly point to as failures are in fact apprentice ****-gibbons.

You cannot compare ubermenschen to apprentice **** gibbons, and then blame the measuring stick for the difference. If the apprentice ****-gibbons DID use the Socratic Method, it would be a disaster. To the untrained, it would refute the Socratic Method itself. Only those with zoology degrees would recognize the real problem - **** slingers.

Well, apprentice **** slingers.

Truth be told, I really don't know what you said here, but for some reason it was still hilarious anyway.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...