Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
BV makes a tribute thread to Huey, then deletes Huey's comments. LOL. Huey, here is his thread. Please induce Mary.
Today 12:49 pm
@Blackvegetable You can't hide here coward.
@Huey
not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”.
He doesn’t.
viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063
I have address the question in the title. Earlier I answered the question in the Op. I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509
He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395
The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527
Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568
No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336
You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.
viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764
OK....too easy...
2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82]
@Huey
not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”.
He doesn’t.
viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063
I have address the question in the title. Earlier I answered the question in the Op. I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509
He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395
The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527
Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568
No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336
You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.
viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764
OK....too easy...
2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82]
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...