Liberal Forum

Looks to me as if you're lying again. Gosh, there's a surprise. It appears that Cucinelli wants to overturn the "right" to sodomy, so as to prosecute child molesters. So how come in 2004, Cuccinelli opposed a bipartisan bill that would have amended the law to comply with Lawrence v. Texas and still be applicable in the MacDonald case? This is not about sex with minors, Cuccinelli wants homosexual sex to be illegal. Perhaps you are correct and I'm wrong. We'd have to see his detailed stance on the issue. Here is a bit of advice Mr. Know It All, instead of just reflexively calling me a liar, you should look into things a little further. Here's a bit of advice. Stop lying and take the time to correct the years of lies you've told. Cuccinelli has made no secret of the fact that he thinks that there should be laws against sodomy, not to protect minors, but to legislate homosexual behavior, nevermind that in the process it affects all consenting adults, gay or straight. Big government at it's finest. And he'll be opposed by libertarian-leaning conservatives, and any attempt to do so will very likely fail. Given that liberal like you want to micromanage the most important issues and smallest details of Americans' lives by force of federal law under penalty of fine or imprisonment, you're hardly one to talk.