User avatar
sole
28 Jun 2022 4:32 pm
User avatar
      
27,394 posts
Skans » 28 Jun 2022, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Who the heck wants to be 90 years old, with time barely moving?  Or, 7 years old with time zipping by?  Would there even be such thing as "time" if we lived forever?
 
 
What determines time existing as eternally separated now? Comparing ancestral cycles with inorganic cycles of motion and changing results in plain sight of mutually occupying space now.

The conflict with time relativity is comparing the value of time to social rank of significance to controlling outcomes forward here, as biology already eternally separates reproductions living currently.
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search